<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Avoid being Penalized by Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:41:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stas</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15017</link>
		<dc:creator>Stas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-15017</guid>
		<description>Thank You very much for nice advice! I am sorry, that I read it to late- 3 days ago I have been penalized by google. I think that I checked and fixed everything.
I have one question- can removing and re including content to solve google penalty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You very much for nice advice! I am sorry, that I read it to late- 3 days ago I have been penalized by google. I think that I checked and fixed everything.<br />
I have one question- can removing and re including content to solve google penalty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank J</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-14410</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-14410</guid>
		<description>Kristi,

Bad neighbor is the reverse, you linking to them and the site is malicious. It&#039;s important to review your comments and the links that each commenter is providing. There&#039;s no way you would get penalized because some malicious site adds your link, that would hurt all sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristi,</p>
<p>Bad neighbor is the reverse, you linking to them and the site is malicious. It&#8217;s important to review your comments and the links that each commenter is providing. There&#8217;s no way you would get penalized because some malicious site adds your link, that would hurt all sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kikolani</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-14377</link>
		<dc:creator>Kikolani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-14377</guid>
		<description>Say some guy writes a adsense spam blog about online pharmacies, and happens to like your SEO blog, so he adds it to his blogroll.   How is that your fault?  Of the black hats that probably are resorting to putting competitor site links in bad neighborhoods.  I think bad neighborhood links shouldn&#039;t count as a vote for your site, but it shouldn&#039;t count as one against it either, since you have no control over who is linking to you.  If it&#039;s not happening already, this can be taken advantage of where someone could create a bad neighborhood and make people pay to get their link out of it.

~ Kristi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say some guy writes a adsense spam blog about online pharmacies, and happens to like your SEO blog, so he adds it to his blogroll.   How is that your fault?  Of the black hats that probably are resorting to putting competitor site links in bad neighborhoods.  I think bad neighborhood links shouldn&#8217;t count as a vote for your site, but it shouldn&#8217;t count as one against it either, since you have no control over who is linking to you.  If it&#8217;s not happening already, this can be taken advantage of where someone could create a bad neighborhood and make people pay to get their link out of it.</p>
<p>~ Kristi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew - Camping Ljubljana</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13963</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew - Camping Ljubljana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13963</guid>
		<description>&quot;Avoid bad neighbors – These are sites linking to your site that are categorized as malicious and or spam websites.&quot;

I always wondered if black hat SEO&#039;s use that as a tool to fight competitive sites? Anyone can put up a spam site and link from there to a competitive site. And Google can&#039;t know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Avoid bad neighbors – These are sites linking to your site that are categorized as malicious and or spam websites.&#8221;</p>
<p>I always wondered if black hat SEO&#8217;s use that as a tool to fight competitive sites? Anyone can put up a spam site and link from there to a competitive site. And Google can&#8217;t know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrimeCleaner</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13931</link>
		<dc:creator>CrimeCleaner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13931</guid>
		<description>Some good advise here.  One thing to thing about is that Google is going through some serious changes right now.  I am seeing a lot of very similar questions across the web. I thinks its time to be patient and see what happens with Google in the next few months..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good advise here.  One thing to thing about is that Google is going through some serious changes right now.  I am seeing a lot of very similar questions across the web. I thinks its time to be patient and see what happens with Google in the next few months..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madhollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13926</link>
		<dc:creator>madhollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13926</guid>
		<description>I have had some really weird issues with my brother&#039;s site which makes me think he has a google issue, but maybe I am just paranoid.

Within the first two months or so of regularly updating content on his site he started showing up strongly for a few different keywords.  He was number one for his name &quot;Jason Zuckerman&quot;, number 3 for the term &quot;Sketch of the Day&quot;, and had several other strong SERP&#039;s.  All of a sudden the organic search traffic which had been building dropped off the face of the earth.  

His site was still indexed by google, but after several weeks of no recovery in his SERP&#039;s I submitted a reinclusion request out of frustration.  Not sure really if that was the right thing to do in retrospect.

I saw a modest improvement after several weeks, but certain SERP&#039;s never recovered.  Even on his name right now he comes in second to a site of lower page rank and as far as I can tell comparable keyword density for his name.  He also has his full name in the url which should be an advantage I had thought.  Occassionally, I will see him at number 1, but more often he is second.

I also observe a yo-yo on &quot;jay zuck&quot; from as high as one to as low as the mid 40&#039;s.  If you search &quot;jay zuck&quot; you will get almost exclusive references to his site which I think is odd for a site ranking in the 40&#039;s often for that very term.

The other odd thing is that google images traffic has increased over the months and continues to grow even while the general search remains low.  It is a real brain scratcher for me, but I put it to you if you have any perspective on this.

Finally, on Yahoo he comes up 3 on &quot;Sketch of the Day&quot; and 1 for his name and &quot;jay zuck&quot; which has the net result of me feeling mocked by google.

I wish I was a regular of this site ages ago and had read an article just like this.  Great and sobering stuff on the dreaded google penalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had some really weird issues with my brother&#8217;s site which makes me think he has a google issue, but maybe I am just paranoid.</p>
<p>Within the first two months or so of regularly updating content on his site he started showing up strongly for a few different keywords.  He was number one for his name &#8220;Jason Zuckerman&#8221;, number 3 for the term &#8220;Sketch of the Day&#8221;, and had several other strong SERP&#8217;s.  All of a sudden the organic search traffic which had been building dropped off the face of the earth.  </p>
<p>His site was still indexed by google, but after several weeks of no recovery in his SERP&#8217;s I submitted a reinclusion request out of frustration.  Not sure really if that was the right thing to do in retrospect.</p>
<p>I saw a modest improvement after several weeks, but certain SERP&#8217;s never recovered.  Even on his name right now he comes in second to a site of lower page rank and as far as I can tell comparable keyword density for his name.  He also has his full name in the url which should be an advantage I had thought.  Occassionally, I will see him at number 1, but more often he is second.</p>
<p>I also observe a yo-yo on &#8220;jay zuck&#8221; from as high as one to as low as the mid 40&#8242;s.  If you search &#8220;jay zuck&#8221; you will get almost exclusive references to his site which I think is odd for a site ranking in the 40&#8242;s often for that very term.</p>
<p>The other odd thing is that google images traffic has increased over the months and continues to grow even while the general search remains low.  It is a real brain scratcher for me, but I put it to you if you have any perspective on this.</p>
<p>Finally, on Yahoo he comes up 3 on &#8220;Sketch of the Day&#8221; and 1 for his name and &#8220;jay zuck&#8221; which has the net result of me feeling mocked by google.</p>
<p>I wish I was a regular of this site ages ago and had read an article just like this.  Great and sobering stuff on the dreaded google penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamal Anwar</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13883</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamal Anwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13883</guid>
		<description>The part where you said PR 4 to PR 2, most of the time people think their site has been banned by google and they got a low PR.

Paid content and text link ad was once the reason for google penalty but now google seems to be okay with them. Even google search shows you have 100&#039;s of pages indexed; you can see the real picture in the new webmaster tools. It will say, 100 pages submitted and 80 pages indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part where you said PR 4 to PR 2, most of the time people think their site has been banned by google and they got a low PR.</p>
<p>Paid content and text link ad was once the reason for google penalty but now google seems to be okay with them. Even google search shows you have 100&#8242;s of pages indexed; you can see the real picture in the new webmaster tools. It will say, 100 pages submitted and 80 pages indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank J</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13872</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13872</guid>
		<description>Bunny, Just like hidden text matching the background color, links can be hidden the same way my masking the hyperlink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bunny, Just like hidden text matching the background color, links can be hidden the same way my masking the hyperlink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BunnygotBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13867</link>
		<dc:creator>BunnygotBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13867</guid>
		<description>Frank- what hidden links are you talking about? I have been using pictures with links in them.
Or do you mean the actual coding if the blog site itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank- what hidden links are you talking about? I have been using pictures with links in them.<br />
Or do you mean the actual coding if the blog site itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BunnygotBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/how-to-avoid-being-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13866</link>
		<dc:creator>BunnygotBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=5552#comment-13866</guid>
		<description>I did the check with four words and my blog did come up first but then another blog with a similar name came up several times on the first page.
So I am not sure about that being so good or is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the check with four words and my blog did come up first but then another blog with a similar name came up several times on the first page.<br />
So I am not sure about that being so good or is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

