<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Pagerank Calculation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jovine</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-25101</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jovine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-25101</guid>
		<description>kington,

Only Google knows that, but I think the toolbar update is overdue. My guess is mid-April, but it&#039;s only a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kington,</p>
<p>Only Google knows that, but I think the toolbar update is overdue. My guess is mid-April, but it&#8217;s only a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingston</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-25097</link>
		<dc:creator>kingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-25097</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know when google will re-re-rank all our sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know when google will re-re-rank all our sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jovine</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-25040</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jovine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-25040</guid>
		<description>Ted,

That was a great share and thank you for the clarification. I know we don&#039;t see decimal points today, but maybe one day the Google Toolbar will include specific calculations using decimals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>That was a great share and thank you for the clarification. I know we don&#8217;t see decimal points today, but maybe one day the Google Toolbar will include specific calculations using decimals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Ives</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-25038</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Ives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-25038</guid>
		<description>Frank, it great to see people are geting some value out of this data

On the PageRank 11 question - yes, no one is a PageRank 11, but someone is probably a PageRank 10.5, 10.75 etc...the toolbar PR that&#039;s reported is rounded down.

In other words, Adobe, Google, Apple, and NASA are probably not all exactly 10.0 but above it somewhere, so I included 11 as a ceiling, probably unattainable but interesting.

Or you could think of it as Nigel Tufnel&#039;s version of PageRank ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, it great to see people are geting some value out of this data</p>
<p>On the PageRank 11 question &#8211; yes, no one is a PageRank 11, but someone is probably a PageRank 10.5, 10.75 etc&#8230;the toolbar PR that&#8217;s reported is rounded down.</p>
<p>In other words, Adobe, Google, Apple, and NASA are probably not all exactly 10.0 but above it somewhere, so I included 11 as a ceiling, probably unattainable but interesting.</p>
<p>Or you could think of it as Nigel Tufnel&#8217;s version of PageRank <img src='http://www.techjaws.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jovine</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-25019</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jovine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-25019</guid>
		<description>Justin,

Your incoming links should have a good mix of websites that have a higher rank than yours in order to achieve good results and a bump in rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin,</p>
<p>Your incoming links should have a good mix of websites that have a higher rank than yours in order to achieve good results and a bump in rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-24963</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-24963</guid>
		<description>My site, sportsalert.com, has 63K backlinks, so I guess with &quot;average&quot; backlinks it&#039;d be PR6! Unfortunately it&#039;s only PR3, I guess that just means that my backlinks realy suck??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My site, sportsalert.com, has 63K backlinks, so I guess with &#8220;average&#8221; backlinks it&#8217;d be PR6! Unfortunately it&#8217;s only PR3, I guess that just means that my backlinks realy suck??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pccure</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-24882</link>
		<dc:creator>pccure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-24882</guid>
		<description>very interesting... thanks for sharing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting&#8230; thanks for sharing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why you shouldn&#8217;t be TOO concerned about ranks &#124; Sebbie on the Webbie</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-24846</link>
		<dc:creator>Why you shouldn&#8217;t be TOO concerned about ranks &#124; Sebbie on the Webbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-24846</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Pagerank Calculation &#124; TechJaws.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Pagerank Calculation | TechJaws.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jovine</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-24844</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jovine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-24844</guid>
		<description>Readbud,

I just hope the chart is close. I like the fact that we all know how and what is needed to move our PR up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readbud,</p>
<p>I just hope the chart is close. I like the fact that we all know how and what is needed to move our PR up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jovine</title>
		<link>http://www.techjaws.com/google-pagerank-calculation/comment-page-1/#comment-24841</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jovine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjaws.com/?p=7644#comment-24841</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

It doesn&#039;t come easy, but with dedication and the right approach you will move up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t come easy, but with dedication and the right approach you will move up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.367 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 22:03:02 -->

